Tag: Fraud Management

  • Asset Assurance: Leveraging our Experience, Maximizing the Network

    Asset Assurance: Leveraging our Experience, Maximizing the Network

    Over the years we have gained a deep understanding of the culture within telcos. We are best known, through the ROC, as specialists in Revenue Assurance and Fraud Management. As such, we know how to deliver different views of the same data.

    Having successfully done this in the BSS world, we have turned our attention to the networking side of the business. Controlling costs and optimizing network capital investment are priorities for the business and managed by the CFO’s office. Optimal usage of the network assets and manage traffic effectively are under the control of the CTO’s office.

    Both offices need access to the same information but in different ways. With different priorities, sharing the same information without interpretation or tailored analytical choices would make communications between the two entities very difficult.

    A CFO needs to know how many assets are stranded and therefore not producing revenue. Right now, the status and whereabouts of only 75 percent of a telco’s assets are known. Knowing where assets are, knowing how long an asset is in place before it is revenue producing and knowing that delaying an investment for a month makes financial sense is of huge importance to a CFO.

    Understanding which assets can be re-used in other parts of the network, or which need to be retired can help the CTO with his priorities. Some assets can be effectively re-sold, so what is a retirement to the CTO becomes a possible source of revenue for the CFO.

    We believe that creating a view into network assets will benefit both offices and create a better collaboration between them. Revenue Assurance can provide a financial view of IT assets, which adds a new and effective dimension to that craft. So, too, Asset Assurance adds the tools to the network capex side of the business to actively manage it. We not only believe it, we know it. Working with one of our customers we found $17 million of stranded assets in a single week. Better yet, Asset Assurance also benefits the customer.

    Talk to a Telecoms Manager about what he would like from his telecoms provider and he will not say more accurate bills as a priority. He accepts that billing is complex and accepts that his comms bill will never be 100 percent accurate. What he would like more than anything is to know what inventory is in place in his organization, where it is, whether it is still live and whether he is paying for it. This can be discovered with Revenue Assurance tools, but now the communication providers can actively manage the whole inventory issue with the new Asset Assurance solution.

    By leveraging our experience in Revenue Assurance and Fraud Management in the OSS world, we are now proud to be able to offer solutions and expertise to operators in all of the vital parts of their business, including network. And we are already proving that this concept of asset assurance is important in managing assets more effectively and efficiently.  We also believe, like many such solutions, that we will discover uses for Asset Assurance that we cannot quite see yet. We will keep you up to date with the story as it unfolds.

  • Subex Tweetup Series 1. Internal Fraud

    Subex Tweetup Series 1. Internal Fraud

    Subex Tweetup Series is a initiative for Subexians to share their knowledge and experience in the field emerging telecom trends and practices through Social Media interactions.

    Today, Mr Rohit Maheshwari (Sr Director Business Consulting APAC) shared interesting insides on Internal Frauds. Internal Fraud has been a key area of concern for telecom operators since long. With the advent of new services like IP Services, Mobile Money and others operators will stand more exposed than ever. Below link contains more information on the conversation with Rohit. Please feel free to comment and add more inputs…

    https://storify.com/ravishpatel/subex-tweetup-internalfraud

    Subex provides holistic revenue assurance coverage in a traditional circuit-switched as well as next generation packet-switched landscape, streamlines integration during a merger, and navigates a technology shift such as Internet of Things (IoT). Our solution meets the revenue assurance needs of mobile and fixed line communications service providers (CSPs), analog data networks, digital data service providers and triple / quad play enterprises. It drives revenue growth by extracting unbilled revenue, leveraging automation to identify revenue leakage, and safeguarding revenue streams from potential losses.

  • Why inline fraud management is necessary to combat POS Frauds?

    Why inline fraud management is necessary to combat POS Frauds?

    Over the years Fraud Management teams have been more reactive in nature and Frauds were usually detected once the event has occurred and the losses are incurred. With the revenues from the traditional services such as Voice & SMS crumbling down and operators looking for newer avenues to sell products and services, it is essential that the wafer thin margins are well protected. This has also forced the Fraud Management teams to be more proactive in nature.

    One of the key focuses of being proactive is to prevent Fraudsters from entering the network. Fraud protection at point of sales stage has got an increased focus in the recent years. CFCA Fraud survey report of 2011 estimates global Point of Sale fraud at almost $5.5 billion. One other startling fact reveals that UK Mobile Operators lose £136M annually to fraudulent transactions at Point of Sales.

    Some of the traditional challenges at Point of Sale include Subscription Fraud and loss due to Handsets being bundled to subscriptions. However with 4G and data heavy environments coming into play there would be more products, services and content sold over various sales channels such as Web Stores and Retail Centers.

    To meet such requirements Fraud Management systems have evolved from being just Near Real Time systems to Real Time Inline systems which can integrate to various Sales Channels. On receiving the orders the system evaluates various order attributes such as Location, Subscriber demographics, Type of order, Type of Retailer and evaluates whether the order is genuine or not.

    If an order is found suspicious, the request can be routed through various workflows within the system such as generating an alert for analyst approval or declining the order directly. Fraud Management system should be flexible enough to add new rules and workflows as the

    new products are launched by the product teams. Behavioral profiling can be also used to track and monitor suspicious behavior patterns on the orders that have been placed.

    Benefits of proactive and inline fraud management is unchallenged. Banking & Payments industry has been practicing these for a long time. By configuring and fine tuning the rules over a period of time it would be possible to detect and prevent majority of Fraud events. One of the recent implementations of Inline Fraud Management for Subscriber Acquisition helped save the operator nearly 2 Million $ in losses and it was observed that Fraud Hit ratio was about 60%. It was also noted that the Fraud Hit over the weekends where as high as 100%. However care has to be taken during such an implementation that only confirmed fraudulent orders are directly rejected by the system as any rejection of genuine orders can give a direct blow to Customer Experience.

    To download infographic, click on the link: Inline Infographic

  • Fraud has the potential to affect entire business adversely !!!

    Fraud has the potential to affect entire business adversely !!!

    Here’s a recent incident with one of FM head in SE Asia. The FM head said, as an organization, the focus last financial year (FY) was on acquiring subscribers. The situation however when the annual report was published was :

    (a) High growth in subscriber numbers
    (b) Significant drop in revenues
    (c) Drop in ARPU & AMPU

    So, what had not gone according to the plan? Marketing had come up with “jazzy plans” to attract new subscribers. This was an avenue for dealers to inflate sales and earn commissions, as they realised the controls were not stringent (falsified subscriptions, dummy subscribers etc). Hence a significant portion of the new customers were taken on-board, but not generating revenue. This not only affected the top-line growth and in turn impacted the health indicators (ARPU and AMPU), but had a snow balling effect on investor confidence. The stocks have since then taken a beating.

    This year the Telco is focusing on cleaning the subscriber base and finding ways to have the others generate more revenue. The FM head said, had we been vigilant while growing, we could have avoided a lot of negative consequences. The learning is fraud not only impacts small pockets of revenue streams. It could potentially impact the business at large. Hence it is imperative to consider fraud aspects as part of the proactive controls when launching new products and services.

  • Should the government be in the business of running a business? – Subex Limited

    Should the government be in the business of running a business? – Subex Limited

    Could privatization of Air India have saved this day? Should the government be running a business? Should it have left the business to people with the necessary skills and expertise? It is argued that privatization, which is a part of disinvestment process, results in better use of resources and efficient allocation. Around the world, many instances of businesses that have thrived after government relinquishing control are common place (there is also the other side that have not taken off well due to various other critical success factors not being met).Nevertheless, increasingly, governments are taking the role of regulators and not producers.

    Is it not a similar situation being observed in Telecom industry? From a situation where the Telco’s produced (or managed) everything themselves, they are shifting their focus to building brand equity, customer satisfaction and user experience. Thus, telco’s are deciding how their eco-system needs to shape and work to achieve their goals (regulators), while a partner is delivering the required results (producers). Some of the strategic outsourcing engagements in India (Bharti and IBM for example) are very good examples of a thriving partnership. What was common place for networks is now spreading its tentacles to B/OSS.

    Of course, many Telco’s are in a quandary on where to fit in functions like Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management – firstly, does it come under tactical operations or strategic business? One RA business head that I know of in the region has been tasked, by the CFO, with a specific KRA of increasing revenue by “x%” from the existing customer base in the current FY. Many more are likely to follow suit in the coming years (refer to KPMG Global RA survey 2012). The profile of RA/FM is changing – in addition to protecting revenues; they are involved in the areas of enhancement & managing revenues. Hence, the answer to the question above – RA/FM are both tactical (producing the desired results) and strategic (supporting the strategic initiatives of the organization).

    Now what would be the right strategy – should I outsource or not? There is no one answer that is right. The only right answer is “what suits you”, depending on the organizational social & cultural makeup, risk appetite and the scale of economic issues. When I meet my customers, we work with multiple options and eventually decide on the best fit. Here are a few possibilities that could be looked at:

    • Pilot program (minimal scope, few people, short duration etc) for the risk averse
    • Bonus / Gain share to ensure accountability from vendors
    • Part outsourcing the tactical part and retaining strategic initiatives (remember one main challenge is to retain resources for career progression reasons. This would be an opportunity to give them the much needed upward movement into a new area)

    No matter what the option chosen, it is important that it works for both the partners in meeting the common goals.

    And, I hope Air India takes off well again – they have better leg-room and delicious food compared to other airlines in the sector.

  • Would Product upgrade alone solve the problem?

    Would Product upgrade alone solve the problem?

    During one of my business travels recently, I met the Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management heads of few telco’s. There was one meeting in particular that struck me – let me call him Jack, the AVP of FM. Jack has been using a Fraud Management System(FMS) for close to 4 years & has certain business challenges to address. Jack was exploring the option of upgrading the FMS to tackle the challenges and needs.

    Jacks’ primary challenge was to build a business case justification for FM upgrade to show the elusive RoI. Apparently, there have been challenges of his team detecting fraud, and he was of the belief that an upgrade will help address the fraud in new generation of services (which the current system is not capable of) and thus contribute to the RoI.

    On probing further it was clear that he’s been under tremendous pressure from the higher-ups to showcase RoI, especially in the recent past due to tough macro-economic conditions. Some more questioning and discussions with his team members revealed that there have been (and are) many hurdles in performing their tasks –

    a)      IT issues pertaining to system availability, performance, processing & tuning

    b)      Knowledge issues in fine-tuning the rules and thresholds periodically

    c)      People issues in understanding the domain and carrying out effective and smart investigations

    While the operator is on a drive to introduce Next Generation services, more than 88% of the revenue still comes from traditional services – Voice, SMS/MMS, Roaming, Interconnect and GPRS. The top frauds also happen in these areas – https://www.cfca.org/fraudlosssurvey/

    It was a revelation for Jack when the data was put up for discussion. It was also evident that an upgrade alone is not going to solve his problem. The need of the hour was an overhaul of the entire eco-system (address the 88%), along with the upgrade (to address the remaining 12%).

    During the course of the discussion, I suggested a few best practices based on prior experience through the Managed Services engagements.

    a)      Conduct an assessment to baseline the performance of the current function, including a SWOT analysis and detailing a roadmap for growth

    b)      Basis assessment, build a business case for justification for skills/efficiency improvement and required technological upgrades

    c)      As next step, strengthen the foundation of fraud prevention by improving on people, process by leveraging on best practices and experience from vendors and partners if needed

    d)     Once the basics are addressed, mature to the next level by incorporating technological, process, procedures & skill upgrades

    I also quoted one such Subex Managed Services engagement in India, where the operator was on an older version of the Fraud Management when the engagement started and has seen more than 2 times RoI within a year, followed by an upgrade to latest version. This helped them in the following ways:

    a)      Optimize the resources as a first step and improve on fraud operations through skilled workforce, leveraging on existing technology and automation of repeatable tasks

    b)      This resulted in significant financial savings, lowered operational and workforce risks, improved knowledge and enhanced business agility

    c)      The highly scalable model for future growth also meant they were able to choose specific fraud related services and technological upgrades depending on its strategic objectives and business priorities

    Jack, being the positive person, was able to appreciate a new perspective on his challenges and is looking forward to a detailed assessment to build a case for strengthening the FM team.

    After this incident, I wonder are there more Jack’s out there with the right intention but not necessarily armed with the right tools?

  • Are you losing 90% of interconnect revenue due to Bypass Fraud ?

    Are you losing 90% of interconnect revenue due to Bypass Fraud ?

    Sim Box Fraud, Landing Fraud, Grey Routing, VOIP Bypass whatever you may want to call it – Bypass Fraud continues to hurt operators across the globe. As per CFCA, operators lost more than 2.88 Billion USD to Bypass fraud in 2011!!! Imagine operators could have sold 7 million Iphones and 3.5 Million Ipads with that much money.
    In the recent past we heard of 2 news involving Bypass fraud in Philippines and Ghana –
    • A huge bypass racket involving three Taiwanese nationals and a Filipino was unearthed at a condo at Makati City – Manila, Philippines. . Losses for operators ran up to millions of Pesos.
    • While in Ghana – where operators have lost millions of dollars to bypass fraud, the regulatory body has made it clear that if it discovers any illegally acquired SIM cards being used for SIM Box fraud, the respective telecom operators would be held responsible and made to pay for it
    Below infographic highlights the unique approach used by Subex to not only detect Bypass fraud but also detect the root cause and prevent it.

    To download pdf, click on the given link Bypass Fraud Infographic

    Sim-Box-Fraud

    Co-Authors – Ravish P, Nithin G & Ashwini S.

    Sources:   https://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=224287
    https://allafrica.com/stories/201112010282.html
    https://www.fox979online.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=78:vodafone-and-police-bust-another-sim-box-fraud&catid=4:business-news&Itemid=4

    https://fixed-mobile-convergence.tmcnet.com/news/2012/01/03/6027997.htm

    https://archives.myrepublica.com/portal/index.php?action=news_details&news_id=29347

    https://www.ossnewsreview.com/telecom-oss/the-berkman-center-defines-bypass-fraud/

    https://fixed-mobile-convergence.tmcnet.com/news/2012/01/03/6027997.htm